Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME)

Characterization and Failure Analysis of A Polymeric Clamp Hanger Component

Abstract

This paper characterizes the failure of a polymeric clamp hanger component using finite element analysis coupled with experimental methods such as scanning electron microscopy, x-ray computed tomography, and mechanical testing. Using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, the material was identified as a polypropylene. Internal porosity that arose from the manufacturing procedure was determined using three dimensional x-ray computed tomography. From static mechanical experiments, the forces applied on the component were determined and used in a finite element simulation, which clearly showed the process of fracture arising from the pre-existing processing pores. The fracture surfaces were observed under a scanning electron microscope confirming the finite element simulation results illustrating that low-cycle fatigue fracture occurred in which the fatigue cracks nucleated from the manufacturing porosity.

Figures

Clamp Hanger

Figure 1: Product and Fractured Component - Clamp Hanger

Polymer Grip

Figure 2: Product and Fractured Component - Fractured Polymer Grip

Clasp with 3 positions

Figure 3: Illustration of grip closure. In Position 1, the clasp is completely opened and unloaded. In Position 2, the clasp is being closed and is contacting the steel bars. In Position 3, the clasp is fully closed and locked into the operating position.

Clasp with position 3

Figure 4: The static loads imparted from the rods on the “clasp” during operation.


Side view of failed grip

Figure 5: Fractured surfaces of a failed grip during operation - side view

Cross section of failed grip

Figure 6: Fractured surfaces of a failed grip during operation - cross-section view

Scan of failed grip

Figure 7: Fractured surfaces of a failed grip during operation - scanning electron micrograph of fractured surface of the boxed area in Figure 6


ESEM central pore

Figure 8: ESEM image of fractured surface - magnification of the central pore

ESEM overall surface

Figure 9: ESEM image of fractured surface - overall fracture surface

ESEM discolored edge

Figure 10: ESEM image of fractured surface - discolored edge


Micro X-ray 3D

Figure 11: Micro X-ray computed tomography scans on the clasp - overall 3-D rendering

Mirco X-ray Central Cross-Section

Figure 12: Micro X-ray computed tomography scans on the clasp - a central cross-section image showing porosity line the left side

Micro X-ray Cross-Section

Figure 13: Micro X-ray computed tomography scans on the clasp - a cross-section image showing porosity line the right side


Transmittance and Wavenumber chart

Figure 14: The FTIR spectrum of the specimen used in this study with the characteristic transmittance bands matching those of isotactic polypropylene (iso-PP)


Colored Rods

Figure 15: Finite element compliance study of the steel rods - elastic simulation of a single rod subjected to 100 N showing the displacement

Displacement and Loading Hook

Figure 16: Finite element compliance study of the steel rods - illustration of the compliance directions of the rods

Hook with angles

Figure 17: Estimated normal load at various rod positions during closure.


True Stress and Strain Graph

Figure 18: Compressive stress–strain response of the polypropylene clasp.


Whole model without pores

Figure 19: Solid models for finite element analysis - whole model without pores

cross-section model with pores

Figure 20: Solid models for finite element analysis - cross-section of model to show pores

orange and green hook

Figure 21: Cross-section of the coarse mesh containing pores. The stress is applied at Area #1 while Area #3 is fixed in the x- and y-directions. The Area #2 denotes the artificially created pores to mimic the micro CT findings.


fidelity mesh without pores

Figure 22: High fidelity meshes in the curved region of the model for both non-pore and pore cases - without pores

fidelity mesh with pores

Figure 23: High fidelity meshes in the curved region of the model for both non-pore and pore cases - with pores


clipped model triaxiality without pores

Figure 24: Clipped models showing - stress triaxiality without pores

clipped model triaxiality with pores

Figure 25: Clipped models showing - stress triaxiality with pores

clipped model von Mises without pores

Figure 26: Clipped models showing - von Mises stress without pores

clipped model von Mises with pores

Figure 27: Clipped models showing - von Mises stress with pores


isosurface without pores

Figure 28: An isosurface of triaxiality for meshes - without pores

isosurface with pores

Figure 29: An isosurface of triaxiality for meshes - with pores

The isosurface is shown in green and represents a triaxiality value of 0.6.

Publication

[D.K. Francis, J. Deang, R.S. Florea, D.R. Gaston, N. Lee, S. Nouranian, C.J. Permann, J. Rudd, D. Seely, W.R. Whittington, M.F. Horstemeyer, Characterization and failure analysis of a polymeric clamp hanger component, Engineering Failure Analysis, Volume 26, December 2012, Pages 230-239.]

Licensing

The figures of this page was reproduced with permission from Elsevier/Rights Link Order No. 501116679.